From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ilya Gladyshev <ilya(dot)v(dot)gladyshev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps |
Date: | 2024-09-03 18:39:25 |
Message-ID: | ZtdX3bdITiozM5fx@nathan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
In v12, I've moved the "queries" PQExpBuffer up to the UpgradeTask struct
so that we don't need to rebuild it for every database. I think this patch
set is in reasonable state, and I still plan to commit it this month.
--
nathan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v12-0001-Introduce-framework-for-parallelizing-various-pg.patch | text/plain | 18.5 KB |
v12-0002-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-subs.patch | text/plain | 9.2 KB |
v12-0003-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-to-get-r.patch | text/plain | 15.7 KB |
v12-0004-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-to-get-l.patch | text/plain | 3.8 KB |
v12-0005-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-exte.patch | text/plain | 4.2 KB |
v12-0006-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-data.patch | text/plain | 13.5 KB |
v12-0007-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-isn-.patch | text/plain | 4.7 KB |
v12-0008-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-post.patch | text/plain | 6.3 KB |
v12-0009-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-poly.patch | text/plain | 7.5 KB |
v12-0010-Use-pg_upgrade-s-new-parallel-framework-for-WITH.patch | text/plain | 4.4 KB |
v12-0011-Use-pg_upgrade-s-parallel-framework-for-encoding.patch | text/plain | 5.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2024-09-03 19:20:30 | Re: Use read streams in pg_visibility |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-09-03 18:35:12 | Re: Minor cleanups in the SSL tests |