Re: Minor refactor: Use more consistent names for the labels of PG_Locale_Strategy

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor refactor: Use more consistent names for the labels of PG_Locale_Strategy
Date: 2024-09-02 00:43:56
Message-ID: ZtUKTButVWIxsp2T@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:06:32AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +1 for your suggestion, as you are suggesting. The original intention
> when PG_Locale_Strategy got introduced was to have everything named as
> PG_REGEX_LOCALE_*, but with the built-in part coming in play in this
> code adding "STRATEGY" is cleaner than just "LOCALE".

Applied this one as 23138284cde4.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-02 00:53:30 Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-02 00:30:20 Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation