Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
Date: 2024-08-19 23:55:06
Message-ID: ZsPbWlXLova1ApZQ@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:25:48AM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:15 PM Fujii Masao
> <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 2024/08/09 17:49, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > I just thought consolidating the information to one place would make
> > > the documentation more readable.
> >
> > Yes, so I think that adding a note about the required remote server version
> > to the cross-version compatibility section would be more intuitive.
> > This section already discusses the necessary server versions and limitations.
> > Patch attached.
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> I noticed that we already have mentioned such a version limitation on
> the analyze_sampling option outside that section (see the description
> for that option in the “Cost Estimation Options” section). So my
> concern is that it might be inconsistent to state only the INSERT
> limitation there. Maybe I am too worried about that.

I think it is an improvement, so applied to master. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-08-20 00:00:00 Re: on_error table, saving error info to a table
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2024-08-19 22:10:56 Re: Detailed release notes