| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted |
| Date: | 2024-08-13 15:09:57 |
| Message-ID: | Zrt3ReA-nB7MJn2q@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 05:35:08PM -0500, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>> Skimming the last few messages of that thread [0], it looks like Bertrand
>> is exploring ways to avoid so many interrupts. I guess the unavoidable
>> question is whether this work is still worthwhile given that improvement.
>
> The way the instrumentation in [0] dealt with interrupts was too complex,
> which is why it seemed better to handle the restart the remainder of the
> sleep in the sleep function
Can you elaborate on how it is too complex?
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-08-13 15:11:50 | Re: tiny step toward threading: reduce dependence on setlocale() |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-08-13 14:57:31 | Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL |