From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL |
Date: | 2024-08-13 14:57:31 |
Message-ID: | CAKAnmmKu6_rBSB8+VASbMPTcJovrJzbSzKLTAEjSYshu8NLGtg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:37 AM David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm not married to the exact syntax of this feature; anything else short
> and consistent could work if `ALL` is considered to potentially
> gain a different interpretation in the future.
>
GROUP BY *
Just kidding. But a big +1 to the whole concept. It would have been
extraordinarily useful over the years.
Cheers,
Greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-08-13 15:09:57 | Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-08-13 14:54:34 | Re: Normalize queries starting with SET for pg_stat_statements |