Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date: 2024-08-13 14:57:31
Message-ID: CAKAnmmKu6_rBSB8+VASbMPTcJovrJzbSzKLTAEjSYshu8NLGtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:37 AM David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net> wrote:

> I'm not married to the exact syntax of this feature; anything else short
> and consistent could work if `ALL` is considered to potentially
> gain a different interpretation in the future.
>

GROUP BY *

Just kidding. But a big +1 to the whole concept. It would have been
extraordinarily useful over the years.

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-08-13 15:09:57 Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-08-13 14:54:34 Re: Normalize queries starting with SET for pg_stat_statements