On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 04:04:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 07:01:38AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> I share the same understanding and I think those can be removed.
>>
>> The patch LGTM.
>
> That sounds about right. All the volatile references we have here
> have been kept under the assumption that a memory barrier is required.
> As we hold spin locks in these areas, that should not be necessary
> anyway. So LGTM as well.
Committed, thanks.
--
nathan