Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2024-07-25 08:16:58
Message-ID: ZqIJ-mofFzZ8ZFeG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:16:51PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 08:43:03AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> Shall we close the open items?
>>
>> Sorry for the typo. There is only one open item corresponding to this:
>> "Subscription and slot information retrieval inefficiency in
>> pg_upgrade" which according to me should be closed after your commit.
>
> Oops, I forgot to do that. I've moved it to the "resolved before 17beta3"
> section.

Removing the item sounds good to me. Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wenhui qiu 2024-07-25 08:18:49 Re: Can we rely on the ordering of paths in pathlist?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-07-25 07:51:35 Re: Convert node test compile-time settings into run-time parameters