Re: Fwd: Regarding tables detach concurrently with run_maintenance_proc()

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-in-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Regarding tables detach concurrently with run_maintenance_proc()
Date: 2024-07-19 14:25:47
Message-ID: Zpp3axAcU7oC5lrB@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-in-general

Re: Durgamahesh Manne
> with pg_partman By default proc() does not detach tables concurrently. How
> do we implement tables detach concurrently without blocking other sessions
> Here queries not using date column to detach tables with
> run_maintenance_proc() which is not using concurrently based on the
> retention policy which leads to scan all available child tables hence need
> to trigger this proc with concurrently option to avoid blocking other child
> tables beyond rentention policy while running statements on them

You might have more success by filing pg_partman issues at
https://github.com/pgpartman/pg_partman/issues

> Do we have any other alternative rather than using pg_partman()?

Well you can just run the same commands manually that pg_partman would
run.

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Durgamahesh Manne 2024-07-19 14:56:37 Re: Fwd: Regarding tables detach concurrently with run_maintenance_proc()
Previous Message Dimitrios Apostolou 2024-07-19 13:31:34 Re: Query on partitioned table needs memory n_partitions * work_mem

Browse pgsql-in-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Durgamahesh Manne 2024-07-19 14:56:37 Re: Fwd: Regarding tables detach concurrently with run_maintenance_proc()
Previous Message Durgamahesh Manne 2024-07-19 12:48:34 Fwd: Regarding tables detach concurrently with run_maintenance_proc()