Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Date: 2024-07-17 16:29:06
Message-ID: ZpfxUqvgDYuMQcya@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 02:04:17PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here's a new version of the patch with the GUC renamed to
> num_os_semaphores.

The only thing stopping me from committing this right now is Tom's upthread
objection about adding more GUCs that just expose values that you can't
actually set. If that objection still stands, I'll withdraw this patch
(and maybe try introducing a new way to surface this information someday).

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2024-07-17 16:49:35 Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2024-07-17 16:10:42 Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin