Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Date: 2024-07-17 17:16:01
Message-ID: 3567380.1721236561@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The only thing stopping me from committing this right now is Tom's upthread
> objection about adding more GUCs that just expose values that you can't
> actually set. If that objection still stands, I'll withdraw this patch
> (and maybe try introducing a new way to surface this information someday).

It still feels to me like not a great way to go about it. Having
said that, it's not like we don't have any existing examples of
the category, so I won't cry hard if I'm outvoted.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2024-07-17 17:20:06 Re: CI, macports, darwin version problems
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-07-17 17:01:42 Re: CI, macports, darwin version problems