Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?
Date: 2024-06-18 03:06:59
Message-ID: ZnD509Q1jROYKhz_@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I didn't see a commitfest entry for this, so I created one to make sure we
don't lose track of this:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/5046/

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2024-06-18 03:14:02 Re: assertion failure at cost_memoize_rescan()
Previous Message David Rowley 2024-06-18 02:53:24 Re: assertion failure at cost_memoize_rescan()