Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?

From: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?
Date: 2024-06-18 10:36:42
Message-ID: 97f04e09-a08a-417c-b65d-5d5cbdd0b845@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 18/06/2024 à 05:06, Nathan Bossart a écrit :
> I didn't see a commitfest entry for this, so I created one to make sure we
> don't lose track of this:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/5046/
>

OK thanks!

By the way, I wonder if there were any off-list discussions after
Robert's conference at PGConf.dev (and I'm waiting for the video of the
conf).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-06-18 10:40:25 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Alena Rybakina 2024-06-18 10:05:23 Re: post-freeze damage control