Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2024-05-15 06:13:23
Message-ID: ZkRSgy7WHH2KEzEt@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 01:33:46PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> thanks for the idea, I roughly played around with it, seems doable.
> but the timing seems not good, reverting is a good idea.

Please note that this is still an open item, and that time is running
short until beta1. A revert seems to be the consensus reached, so,
Peter, are you planning to do so?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-05-15 06:15:37 Re: pgsql: Fix overread in JSON parsing errors for incomplete byte sequence
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-05-15 06:00:00 Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?