| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible |
| Date: | 2024-04-11 01:01:23 |
| Message-ID: | Zhc2Y-hbuGIE5DQ8@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:33:49AM +0300, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> As far as I understand CF entry [0] is committed? I understand that
> there are some open followups, but I just want to determine correct
> CF item status...
So much work has happened on this thread with things that has been
committed, so switching the entry to committed makes sense to me. I
have just done that.
Bharath, could you create a new thread with the new things you are
proposing? All that should be v18 work, particularly v27-0002:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACWCibnX2jcnRreBHFesFeQ6vbKiFstML=w-JVTvUKD_EA@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-11 01:12:10 | Re: CI and test improvements |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-11 00:35:38 | Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres |