Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Date: 2024-04-09 06:33:49
Message-ID: B7DA0FBD-DFAF-411E-8E9C-ADB63A11AF1C@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Apr 2024, at 08:17, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

Hi Bharath!

As far as I understand CF entry [0] is committed? I understand that there are some open followups, but I just want to determine correct CF item status...

Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

[0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4060/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-09 06:53:08 Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-04-09 06:21:39 Re: SET ROLE documentation improvement