| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: UUID v7 |
| Date: | 2024-03-12 06:31:48 |
| Message-ID: | Ze_21IrevF5Nro-g@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:10:37AM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2024, at 10:53, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> On 22 Jan 2024, at 09:22, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai> wrote:
>>
>> And many libraries are already including implementation of UUIDv7 – here are some examples:
>>
>> - https://www.npmjs.com/package/uuidv7
>> - https://crates.io/crates/uuidv7
>> - https://github.com/google/uuid/pull/139
>
> So at least reviewing patch and agreeing on chosen methods and constants makes sense.
Sure, there is no problem in discussing a patch to implement a
behavior. But I disagree about taking a risk in merging something
that could become non-compliant with the approved RFC, if the draft is
approved at the end, of course. This just strikes me as a bad idea.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-03-12 06:40:00 | Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-03-12 06:17:11 | Re: Spurious pgstat_drop_replslot() call |