| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake |
| Date: | 2024-02-28 04:26:46 |
| Message-ID: | Zd62BjrRH2LRoOll@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:39:59PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> So, I'm ok with the new helper too.
If both of you feel strongly about that, I'm OK with introducing
something like that. Now, a routine should be only about waiting on
pg_stat_activity to report something, as for the logs we already have
log_contains(). And a test may want one check, but unlikely both.
Even if both are wanted, it's just a matter of using log_contains()
and the new routine that does pg_stat_activity lookups.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-02-28 04:37:22 | Re: Improve readability by using designated initializers when possible |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2024-02-28 04:18:59 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |