From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log |
Date: | 2024-01-30 00:51:01 |
Message-ID: | ZbhH9Zh3C7ubYluJ@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:03:19AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> I took a pass at this on PG14 and things definitely look a lot different
> back there. Not only is the timeline missing, but there are two sections of
> code for ending a backup, one for standby backup and one for primary.
Unfortunately. The TLI from the start WAL segment lacking from these
APIs is really annoying especially if the backup_label is gone for
some reason..
> I'm satisfied with the back patches as they stand, unless anyone else wants
> to have a look.
Okay, thanks for double-checking!
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-01-30 00:53:19 | Question on LWLockMode in dsa.c |
Previous Message | Sergey Prokhorenko | 2024-01-30 00:27:21 | Re: UUID v7 |