Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Date: 2024-01-30 00:51:01
Message-ID: ZbhH9Zh3C7ubYluJ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:03:19AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> I took a pass at this on PG14 and things definitely look a lot different
> back there. Not only is the timeline missing, but there are two sections of
> code for ending a backup, one for standby backup and one for primary.

Unfortunately. The TLI from the start WAL segment lacking from these
APIs is really annoying especially if the backup_label is gone for
some reason..

> I'm satisfied with the back patches as they stand, unless anyone else wants
> to have a look.

Okay, thanks for double-checking!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-01-30 00:53:19 Question on LWLockMode in dsa.c
Previous Message Sergey Prokhorenko 2024-01-30 00:27:21 Re: UUID v7