Re: [PATCH] clarify palloc comment on quote_literal_cstr

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Chavez <steve(at)supabase(dot)io>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clarify palloc comment on quote_literal_cstr
Date: 2025-04-08 06:30:24
Message-ID: Z_TCgMSLjQZIXtEs@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 01:26:59AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1. When I saw the patch I was mainly afraid that pgindent would
> make a hash of it.

Yes. I was actually surprised to see that it did not mess up with the
code generated.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2025-04-08 06:31:16 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Previous Message Nico Williams 2025-04-08 06:29:42 Re: pg16 && GSSAPI && Heimdal/Macos