From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Track in pg_replication_slots the reason why slots conflict? |
Date: | 2023-12-26 08:50:00 |
Message-ID: | ZYqTuNUANEVpdF55@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 05:23:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:44:44AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Does anyone else have a preference on whether to change the existing
> > column or add a new one?
>
> Just to be clear here, I'd vote for replacing the existing boolean
> with a text.
Same here, I'd vote to avoid 2 columns having the same "meaning".
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ywgrit | 2023-12-26 09:25:05 | Re: planner chooses incremental but not the best one |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-12-26 08:49:04 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |