Re: Track in pg_replication_slots the reason why slots conflict?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Track in pg_replication_slots the reason why slots conflict?
Date: 2023-12-26 08:23:56
Message-ID: ZYqNnMPxuLIk8Wpv@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:44:44AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Does anyone else have a preference on whether to change the existing
> column or add a new one?

Just to be clear here, I'd vote for replacing the existing boolean
with a text.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2023-12-26 08:27:16 Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-12-26 08:06:37 Re: "pgoutput" options missing on documentation