Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file
Date: 2023-12-20 23:39:26
Message-ID: ZYN7LqkMZ7GqUlLu@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:36:28AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> We fairly regularly have commits breaking the generation of INSTALL. IIRC we
>> recently discussed building it locally unconditionally, but I couldn't
>> immediately find that discussion. Until then, I think we should at least
>> build it in CI so that cfbot can warn.
>
> I thought the plan was to get rid of that file, in pursuit of making
> our distribution tarballs be more or less pure git pulls. Instead of
> expending more effort on it, why not just push that project forward?
> (IIRC, what we intended to do instead was to modify the top-level
> README to point at the HTML install directions on the web.)

Hmm. It depends on if the next release should include it or not, but
let me add my +1 for replacing it with a simple redirect.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-12-20 23:44:33 Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-12-20 23:34:14 Re: Remove MSVC scripts from the tree