| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2023-12-28 17:37:16 |
| Message-ID: | ZY2yTDqdFPf6Rw8f@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 12:28:06PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> What I am proposing is *import* functions. I didn't say anything about
> how pg_dump obtains the data it prints; however, I would advocate that
> we keep that part as simple as possible. You cannot expect export
> functionality to know the requirements of future server versions,
> so I don't think it's useful to put much intelligence there.
>
> True, but presumably you'd be using the pg_dump/pg_upgrade of that future
> version to do the exporting, so the export format would always be tailored to
> the importer's needs.
I think the question is whether we will have the export functionality in
the old cluster, or if it will be queries run by pg_dump and therefore
also run by pg_upgrade calling pg_dump.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2023-12-28 17:45:40 | Windows sockets (select missing events?) |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-12-28 17:36:42 | Re: broken master regress tests |