From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? |
Date: | 2023-10-30 14:01:14 |
Message-ID: | ZT-3KgndQLQ_bnFy@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:22:08PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> If I change STD_FUZZ_FACTOR to something like 1.0000001 then the plans
> no longer change when I do:
>
> alter server loopback options (add fdw_tuple_cost '0.01');
> <run the query>
> alter server loopback options (drop fdw_tuple_cost);
> <run the query>
>
> Ordinarily, I'd not care too much about that, but I did test the
> performance of one of the plans and the new plan came out slower than
> the old one.
>
> I'm not exactly sure how best to proceed on this in the absence of any feedback.
I think you just go and change it. Your number is better than what we
have, and if someone wants to suggest a better number, we can change it
later.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2023-10-30 14:06:41 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-10-30 13:58:20 | Re: COPY TO (FREEZE)? |