From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: COPY TO (FREEZE)? |
Date: | 2023-10-30 13:58:20 |
Message-ID: | ZT-2fIbhw1d8QOAI@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:16:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Sun, 29 Oct 2023 15:35:02 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote in
> > You are 100% correct. Updated patch attached.
>
> - errmsg("COPY force not null only available using COPY FROM")));
> + errmsg("COPY force not null cannot be used with COPY TO")));
>
> I find the term "force not null" hard to translate, especially into
> Japaese, as its literal translation doesn't align with the entire
> message. The most recent translation for it is the literal rendition
> of "FORCE_NOT_NULL option of COPY can only be used with COPY FROM".
>
> In short, for translation convenience, I would prefer if "force not
> null" were "FORCE_NOT_NULL".
That is a good point. I reviewed more of the messages and added
capitalization where appropriate, patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
freeze.diff | text/x-diff | 5.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-10-30 14:01:14 | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? |
Previous Message | Bohdan Mart | 2023-10-30 13:57:08 | Including Doxyfile and Meson script for docs into main source tree |