| From: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures |
| Date: | 2020-11-25 18:23:44 |
| Message-ID: | ZR0P278MB010531F3376F873D0F2FC8E9D2FA0@ZR0P278MB0105.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hi Bruce,
>On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html
>> Description:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions
>> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well?
>Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI
>server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the
>attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a
>need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document.
>Does this seem sufficient?
Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend?
Regards
Daniel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-11-25 18:30:44 | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-11-25 18:14:18 | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures |