| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | dwe(at)dbi-services(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures |
| Date: | 2020-11-25 18:14:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20201125181418.GE26300@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html
> Description:
>
> Hi,
>
> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions
> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well?
Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI
server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the
attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a
need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document.
Does this seem sufficient?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| proc.diff.gz | application/gzip | 1.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2020-11-25 18:23:44 | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2020-11-24 19:15:29 | Functions should be Functions & Procedures |