| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
| Date: | 2023-09-21 23:47:23 |
| Message-ID: | ZQzWC5e9cfjOs7-O@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:50:28PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> We have discussed this point. Normally, we don't have such options in
> upgrade, so we were hesitent to add a new one for this but there is a
> discussion to add an --exclude-logical-slots option. We are planning
> to add that as a separate patch after getting some more consensus on
> it. Right now, the idea is to get the main patch ready.
Okay. I am wondering if the subscriber part is OK now without an
option, but that could also be considered separately, as well. At
least I hope so.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Fan | 2023-09-22 00:38:24 | Re: Questioning an errcode and message in jsonb.c |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-09-21 23:18:52 | Re: Disabling Heap-Only Tuples |