Re: Cross-Product JOIN?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>
Cc: Atomic_Sheep <atomic(dot)sheep(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cross-Product JOIN?
Date: 2023-09-07 19:48:23
Message-ID: ZPopB6uIgkoihr2N@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:10:37PM +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > On 24/05/2023 15:46 CEST Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I think it should read cartesian product because cross product is
> > an overloaded term and cartesian product is used more often in the documentation
> > overall.
> >
> > But the same page [0] also uses cross product when talking about grouping sets.
> >
> > [0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/queries-table-expressions.html
>
> Here's a patch that fixes those two places.

Patch applied to master, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-09-07 20:33:37 Re: Incorrect/confusing information about timetz
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-09-07 18:21:43 Re: pg_class.relpages documentation does not mention relpages corner case