| From: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atomic_Sheep <atomic(dot)sheep(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Cross-Product JOIN? |
| Date: | 2023-05-24 19:10:37 |
| Message-ID: | 2053109544.160895.1684955437950@office.mailbox.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 24/05/2023 15:46 CEST Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> wrote:
>
> Personally, I think it should read cartesian product because cross product is
> an overloaded term and cartesian product is used more often in the documentation
> overall.
>
> But the same page [0] also uses cross product when talking about grouping sets.
>
> [0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/queries-table-expressions.html
Here's a patch that fixes those two places.
--
Erik
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Use-Cartesian-product-consistently-in-docs.patch | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-05-25 04:52:14 | Re: Cross-Product JOIN? |
| Previous Message | Erik Wienhold | 2023-05-24 13:46:28 | Re: Cross-Product JOIN? |