| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rui Zhao <xiyuan(dot)zr(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade fails with in-place tablespace[ |
| Date: | 2023-09-05 05:56:55 |
| Message-ID: | ZPbDJ7Li35PSO+ty@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 10:28:44AM +0800, Rui Zhao wrote:
> It would be highly appreciated if the official PG could also
> incorporate support for this feature.
This is a development option, and documented as such. You may also
want to be aware of the fact that tablespaces in the data folder
itself are discouraged, because they don't really make sense, and that
we generate a WARNING if trying to do that since 33cb8ff6aa11.
I don't have really have more to add, but others interested in this
topic are of course free to share their opinions and/or comments.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2023-09-05 07:00:54 | Re: Impact of checkpointer during pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2023-09-05 05:50:12 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |