Re: Removing the fixed-size buffer restriction in hba.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing the fixed-size buffer restriction in hba.c
Date: 2023-07-25 00:45:06
Message-ID: ZL8bEvxYq8NdopzA@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 08:21:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I dithered about that. I felt like removing it only to put it
> back later would be silly, but then again maybe there won't ever be
> a need to put it back. I'm OK with removing it if there's not
> objections.

Seeing what this code does, the odds of needing an err_msg seem rather
low to me, so I would just remove it for now for the sake of clarity.
It can always be added later if need be.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-07-25 01:33:52 Optimizing nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, allowing multi-column ordered scans, skip scan
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-07-25 00:25:25 Re: odd buildfarm failure - "pg_ctl: control file appears to be corrupt"