From: | raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SOC II Type 2 report. |
Date: | 2023-06-14 07:48:27 |
Message-ID: | ZIlwy4ftHXdi1j0a@raf.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 07:54:21AM -0700, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Jun 12, 2023, at 11:57, Raj Kiran <raj(dot)kiran(at)prokopto(dot)io> wrote:
> > Prokopto is completing our annual vendor review process. Please share your most recent SOC II Type 2 report.
>
> The PostgreSQL project isn't SOC2 certified, and will almost certainly
> never be. If you require SOC2 compliance, you'll need to work with a
> commercial (that is to say, not free) vendor who is SOC2 certified in
> order to bring PostgreSQL under their certification.
And I doubt that Postgres could be described as a
vendor. By definition, a vendor is a person or
organisation that sells something.
OED: vendor(n): One who disposes of a thing by sale; a seller
cheers,
raf
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ruslan Zakirov | 2023-06-14 10:03:06 | Re: Reproducing incorrect order with order by in a subquery |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-06-13 21:56:42 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |