Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM
Date: 2023-05-29 05:38:00
Message-ID: ZHQ6OKMF7BbeZvri@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 02:21:53PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> The above assumes that the reader reviewed the previous paragraph and
> followed the guidelines there. However, we can make it explicit. Please see
> attached.

Yeah, I was under the same impression as Jacob that we don't insist
enough in this new paragraph about what sslmode ought to be when I
initially read the patch. However, looking at the html page produced,
what you have to refer to the previous paragraph looks OK to me.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yu Shi (Fujitsu) 2023-05-29 06:15:28 RE: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message John Naylor 2023-05-29 04:43:13 Re: contrib/spi/insert_username.c comment typo?