| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Evgeny Morozov <postgresql3(at)realityexists(dot)net>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice |
| Date: | 2023-05-08 21:45:39 |
| Message-ID: | ZFltg5dFMqG92UeV@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:15:20PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I am able to reproduce this using the steps given above, I am also
> trying to analyze this further. I will send the update once I get
> some clue.
Have you been able to reproduce this on HEAD or at the top of
REL_15_STABLE, or is that 15.2-ish without fa5dd46?
One thing I was wondering about to improve the odds of the hits is to
be more aggressive with the number of relations created at once, so as
we are much more aggressive with the number of pages extended in
pg_class from the origin database.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-08 22:04:23 | Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-05-08 21:04:00 | Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice |