Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Evgeny Morozov <postgresql3(at)realityexists(dot)net>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice
Date: 2023-05-08 22:04:23
Message-ID: 486434.1683583463@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> One thing I was wondering about to improve the odds of the hits is to
> be more aggressive with the number of relations created at once, so as
> we are much more aggressive with the number of pages extended in
> pg_class from the origin database.

Andres seems to think it's a problem with aborting a DROP DATABASE.
Adding more data might serve to make the window wider, perhaps.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-05-08 22:39:49 Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-05-08 21:45:39 Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice