From: | Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt(at)burggraben(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DEFINER / INVOKER conundrum |
Date: | 2023-04-03 12:59:03 |
Message-ID: | ZCrNl0h+5vS/m9Nc@squirrel.exwg.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
## Dominique Devienne (ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com):
> On the one hand, I want a INVOKER security function,
> to be able to capture the login and current ROLEs.
There's session_user ("the session user's name") which remains unchanged
on a SECURITY DEFINER function, and current_user ("the user name of the
current execution context") which changes according to the security
context set by SECURITY DEFINER/INVOKER.
-> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Moench-Tegeder | 2023-04-03 13:06:04 | Re: Very slow queries followed by checkpointer process killed with signal 9 |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2023-04-03 12:33:19 | Re: Very slow queries followed by checkpointer process killed with signal 9 |