| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability |
| Date: | 2025-02-27 15:42:45 |
| Message-ID: | Z8CH9SVZLv2j/lwF@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:06 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > Why is this done before we even have gotten -2 back? Even if we need it, it
> > seems like we ought to defer this until necessary.
>
> Not fixed yet: maybe we could even do a `static` with
> `has_this_run_earlier` and just perform this work only once during the
> first time?
Not sure I get your idea, could you share what the code would look like?
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexandra Wang | 2025-02-27 15:46:48 | Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-02-27 15:40:18 | Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors |