Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors
Date: 2025-02-27 15:40:18
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDLp5cYz_G7hvhrUSxDg-WRYfF-55Df9sxjeDh80XpBgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

út 25. 2. 2025 v 6:32 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

> Hi
>
> po 24. 2. 2025 v 21:05 odesílatel Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
> napsal:
>
>> Review:
>>
>> This patch claims to add SQL/PSM named arguments syntax to cursors and
>> this what it does exactly.
>>
>> It compiles without error with master current code and all tests
>> passed successfully.
>>
>> I think it could be ready to be committed.
>>
>>
>> Note for the committer: does it make sense to mention in the
>> documentation that this standard SQL/PSM syntax is preferred than the PG
>> syntax?
>>
>
I modified doc in same manner like function's named arguments are described

Regards

Pavel

>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>
> Thank you for review
>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Gilles Darold
>> http://www.darold.net/
>>
>>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v20250227-0002-Separate-old-proprietary-syntax-to-own-para-with-not.patch text/x-patch 2.5 KB
v20250227-0001-allow-to-use-standard-syntax-for-named-arguments-for.patch text/x-patch 3.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-02-27 15:42:45 Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-02-27 15:34:25 Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability