From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing |
Date: | 2025-02-21 11:46:03 |
Message-ID: | Z7hne2Ba5L5Z0VcG@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:29:12PM +0100, Jim Jones wrote:
> For future reference, what’s the best way to verify this myself? The
> buildfarm was all green.
Don't worry, we are all trapped by that at some point.
One way would be to generate by yourself dumps from an older version
by yourself, as documented by src/bin/pg_upgrade/TESTING, part DETAILS
(the part about USE_MODULE_DB=1 is very important). Then you can
reuse the SQL files by specifying an old dump files in the TAP tests
of pg_upgrade. The buildfarm does exactly that.
For every commit, doing this much testing is a bit annoying, and I
face this issue less than once a year for anything I apply. So let's
say that I trust the buildfarm to report back at this stage ;)
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-02-21 11:48:21 | Re: Support POSITION with nondeterministic collations |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-02-21 11:44:15 | Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c) |