Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing
Date: 2025-02-21 14:53:06
Message-ID: 3074698.1740149586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:29:12PM +0100, Jim Jones wrote:
>> For future reference, what’s the best way to verify this myself? The
>> buildfarm was all green.

> Don't worry, we are all trapped by that at some point.

Yeah, I leave that to the buildfarm too.

If I have to actually debug or test behavior touching this, I use a
non-reporting buildfarm instance that I have lying around, which is
configured to run the cross-version tests and not very much else.
I can switch that between pulling source from the community repo
and pulling from a local checkout that has the mods I want to test.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-02-21 15:01:00 Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2025-02-21 14:47:39 Re: dblink: Add SCRAM pass-through authentication