Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic
Date: 2025-01-30 07:05:24
Message-ID: Z5sktELEALTiROUa@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 08:57:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So the situation is a bit of a mess in all the branches, a bit worse
> in 17~ due to the fact that epochs are poorly integrated, but I'm
> getting there with a set of patches mostly ready to be sent, and I
> think that this would be OK for a backpatch. My plan is to start a
> new thread to deal with the matter, because that's a bit larger than
> the topic you have raised on this thread. I'll add you and Noah in CC
> for awareness.

And done that here, with a closer lookup at everything I've bumped
into:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z5sd5O9JO7NYNK-C%40paquier.xyz
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-01-30 07:08:51 RE: Improve error handling for invalid slots and ensure a same 'inactive_since' time for inactive slots
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-01-30 06:38:08 Re: Enhance 'pg_createsubscriber' to retrieve databases automatically when no database is provided.