On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 10:15:20AM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> I am a bit confused, are you suggesting these two alternatives:
> 1- Making pgstat_count_io_op_n() static and continuing to use
> pgstat_count_io_op() as it is.
> 2- Removing pgstat_count_io_op() and instead using
> pgstat_count_io_op_n() everywhere.
Either of these options is OK by me. The current state of things just
seems a bit strange because we publish a routine that's used nowhere.
If you have plans for it in a different patch, that's also fine.
--
Michael