Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic

From: Давыдов Виталий <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic
Date: 2025-01-09 08:21:38
Message-ID: 2a5ab6-677f8700-1f-36d162c0@246596326
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday, December 30, 2024 04:08 MSK, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> Instead, I have gone with a new
> FullTransactionIdFromCurrentEpoch() that replaces
> AdjustToFullTransactionId(). It cleans up most of the calls to
> ReadNextFullTransactionId() compared to the previous patch. It is
> true that these couple with calls to ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer(), but the
> result felt OK this way in the scope of this fix.

Could you please send the latest version of the patch, if any? I haven't found any new patches in the latest email.

Happy New Year!

With best regards,
Vitaly

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luca Ferrari 2025-01-09 08:37:08 Re: pg_settings.unit and DefineCustomXXXVariable
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-01-09 08:11:02 Re: Make pg_stat_io view count IOs as bytes instead of blocks