Re: Outdated comment on scram_build_secret

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Outdated comment on scram_build_secret
Date: 2024-12-10 00:58:28
Message-ID: Z1eSNOhzV3yLzXKS@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:39:03PM -0300, Matheus Alcantara wrote:
> Commit b577743000 introduced the assert and remove the if condition. All
> usages of this function is using an iteration > 0, so I think that is just a
> matter of updating the documentation? If that's the case the attached patch
> does that.

Ah, good catch.

> - * If iterations is 0, default number of iterations is used. The result is
> - * palloc'd or malloc'd, so caller is responsible for freeing it.
> + * The result is palloc'd or malloc'd, so caller is responsible for freeing it.

Removing the comment sounds like the right thing to do here. I'll go
do that in a bit down to v16.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-10 01:14:17 Fix some comments for GUC hooks of timezone_abbreviations
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-10 00:54:36 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70