| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70 |
| Date: | 2024-12-10 00:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | Z1eRTELjXqieX0mI@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:03:54AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Right. OTOH I think that could help the tap test added in da99fedf8c to not
> rely on assert enabled build (the tap test could "simply" check for the
> WARNING in the logfile instead).
That's true. Still, the coverage that we have is also enough for
assert builds, which is what the test is going to run with most of the
time anyway.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-12-10 00:58:28 | Re: Outdated comment on scram_build_secret |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-12-10 00:31:18 | Re: FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS |