Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_upgrade test from v10

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_upgrade test from v10
Date: 2022-08-02 10:28:41
Message-ID: Yuj8Wf7R2nkqImqy@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:04:39AM +0300, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> I looked at this thread and tried to apply some changes from it in practice.
> And found one strange error and describe it in a comment here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cc7e961a-d5ad-8c6d-574b-478aacc11cf7%40inbox.ru
> It would be interesting to know if it occures on
> my PC only or somewhere else.

As mentioned upthread, please note that I'll send my arguments on the
other thread where I have sent my patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-02 10:32:54 Re: Allow file inclusion in pg_hba and pg_ident files
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-02 10:25:49 Re: Fix obsoleted comments for function prototypes