| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase |
| Date: | 2022-07-01 01:22:16 |
| Message-ID: | Yr5MSLivgV2UKOjD@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 08:57:04AM -0400, Isaac Morland wrote:
> I was going to point out that pg_database_owner is the same way, but it is
> fundamentally different in that it has no special allowed access and is
> meant to be the target of permission grants rather than being granted to
> other roles.
>
> +1 to rename it to pg_checkpoint or to some similar name.
We are still in beta, so, FWIW, I am fine to adjust this name even if
it means an extra catversion bump.
"checkpoint" is not a verb (right?), so would something like
"pg_perform_checkpoint" rather than "pg_checkpoint" fit better in the
larger picture?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-07-01 01:41:55 | Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-07-01 01:09:07 | Re: PATCH: Add Table Access Method option to pgbench |