| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase |
| Date: | 2022-07-01 03:03:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20220701030334.GB13040@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:22:16AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 08:57:04AM -0400, Isaac Morland wrote:
> > I was going to point out that pg_database_owner is the same way, but it is
> > fundamentally different in that it has no special allowed access and is
> > meant to be the target of permission grants rather than being granted to
> > other roles.
> >
> > +1 to rename it to pg_checkpoint or to some similar name.
>
> We are still in beta, so, FWIW, I am fine to adjust this name even if
> it means an extra catversion bump.
>
> "checkpoint" is not a verb (right?), so would something like
Why not ? There's a *command* called "checkpoint".
It is also a noun.
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-07-01 03:05:37 | Re: Backup command and functions can cause assertion failure and segmentation fault |
| Previous Message | Isaac Morland | 2022-07-01 02:58:51 | Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase |