| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser |
| Date: | 2022-04-13 07:10:01 |
| Message-ID: | YlZ3SWm36Nho+xAI@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:46:25PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> It is sensible to rig createuser command with full capability of
> CREATE ROLE is reasonable.
>
> Only --replication is added by commit 9b8aff8c19 (2010) since
> 8ae0d476a9 (2005). BYPASSRLS and NOBYPASSRLS were introduced by
> 491c029dbc (2014) but it seems to have forgotten to add the
> corresponding createuser options.
>
> By a quick search, found a few other CREATE ROLE optinos that are not
> supported by createuser.
My question is: is BYPASSRLS common enough to justify having a switch
to createuser? As the development cycle of 15 has just finished and
that we are in feature freeze, you may want to hold on new patches for
a bit. The next commit fest is planned for July.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-04-13 07:18:59 | Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-04-13 07:04:03 | Re: Atomic rename feature for Windows. |